The UCL Practitioner
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
Consumer Advocates opinion is now up
The unpublished Consumer Advocates opinion is now online at this link. In a nutshell, the Court did not decide the Prop. 64 retroactivity issue. Footnote 2 ends as follows:
[I]n view of our conclusion the judgment must be reversed for other reasons, we need not decide the issue of Proposition 64’s applicability to the facts in this case and leave that question for another day.
Another day might come very soon, as a number of appeals are still pending in which this District and Division requested supplemental briefing on Proposition 64.
Comments: Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger

© 2003-2005 by Kimberly A. Kralowec