The UCL Practitioner

The UCL Practitioner has moved! Please visit the first and only weblog on California's Business & Professions Code section 17200 (otherwise known as the Unfair Competition Law or "UCL") at its new home, www.uclpractitioner.com.

by

Kimberly A. Kralowec
Attorney at Law
Links:

Home

Welcome

The UCL:

Proposition 64:

Text of Proposition 64

The CLRA:

Class Actions:

Code Civ. Proc. Â§382

Fed. R. Civ. P. 23

"Fairness" Act

Recent Posts:

Court of Appeal issues unpublished opinion in Cons...

Two new pro-plaintiff Prop. 64 rulings

"Lawsuits Take Aim at Ads for Alcohol"

First District to consider Prop. 64 retroactivity ...

By popular demand, some Prop. 64 briefs

I heard it through the grapevine ...

Contingency fees as taxable income to the client?

Latest issue of Competition

Another update on Bivens

Welcome, Recorder readers

Blogs at Large:

The UCL Practitioner

Tuesday, February 01, 2005

Three more Prop. 64 rulings
Here are three more rulings, all favoring retroactive application of Proposition 64:

Kottaras v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Los Angeles County Superior Court case no. LC069427, Judge Ruth Essegian (tentative ruling dated 12/23/04)
In re Tobacco Cases II, JCCP no. 4042, San Diego County Superior Court, Judge Ronald S. Prager (tentative ruling of 01/21/05)
Spielman v. Ex'Pression Center for New Media, Alameda County Superior Court case no. RG04174927, Judge James A. Richman (order dated 01/24/05)

Last night I updated my list of Prop. 64 orders as well as my list of Prop. 64 pending appeals.
- posted by Kim Kralowec @ 7:46 AM

Comments: Post a Comment