The UCL Practitioner has moved! Please visit the first and only weblog on California's Business & Professions Code section 17200 (otherwise known as the Unfair Competition Law or "UCL") at its new home, www.uclpractitioner.com.
Text of Proposition 64
Trial Court Orders
Text of the CLRA
Code Civ. Proc. Â§382
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23
Digression: "Why There's No Escaping the BLOG"
"Court to decide when lawsuit limit began"
New Prop. 64 order: Jarvis v. Royal Numico N.V.
Supreme Court acts in two Proposition 64 cases
New UCL decision: PETA v. California Milk Producer...
MCLE for my friends in So Cal
Update on Bivens
Two upcoming MCLE programs on the UCL
Yet another pro-plaintiff Prop. 64 order: Munoz v....
Another pro-plaintiff Prop. 64 order: Americare v....
California Law Blogs:
Bag and Baggage
California Appellate Report
California Election Law
California Labor & Employment Law
California Wage Law
Class Action Spot
Declarations and Exclusions
Employment Law Observer
The Legal Reader
May it Please the Court
Ninth Circuit Blog (criminal)
Public Defender Dude
Silicon Valley Media Law Blog
So Cal Law Blog
More Law Blogs:
Appellate Law & Practice
The Common Scold
Connecticut Law Blog
Corp Law Blog
Delaware Law Office
Employee Relations Law and News
Ernie the Attorney
Have Opinion, Will Travel
IP Law Observer
Legal Blog Watch
the [non]billable hour
Point of Law
Real Lawyers Have Blogs
Sentencing Law & Policy
The Volokh Conspiracy
The UCL Practitioner
Monday, January 17, 2005
Upcoming appellate oral arguments on Proposition 64
Happy Martin Luther King, Jr. Day!
According to the Court of Appeal's website, several pending appeals raising the Proposition 64 retroactivity issue have been scheduled for oral argument in the near future:
- Thursday, January 20, 2005, 1:30 p.m.:
- Friday, January 21, 2005, 1:30 p.m.:
- Schulz v. Ginix Corp., case no. G033879, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three (Rylaarsdam, Bedsworth & Fybel, JJ.)
- Thursday, February 17, 2005, 1:30 p.m.:
I've already got one roving reporter signed up to attend the arguments on January 20 (although additional reports are always welcome). If you can volunteer to attend one or more of the other arguments and send me a report, please let me know. I urge all those who are planning to attend these arguments to double-check the court's calendar yourselves to make sure the arguments haven't been rescheduled. (And by the way, did you know that Justice Bedsworth is a blogger?)
- Lytwyn v. Fry's Electronics, Inc., case no. D042401, Fourth Appellate District, Division One (Benke, Nares & Aaron, JJ.)
- posted by Kim Kralowec @ 8:30 AM
Comments: Post a Comment