The UCL Practitioner has moved! Please visit the first and only weblog on California's Business & Professions Code section 17200 (otherwise known as the Unfair Competition Law or "UCL") at its new home, www.uclpractitioner.com.
Proposition 64:
Text of Proposition 64
Trial Court Orders
Appellate Opinions
Pending Appeals
Appellate Briefs
The CLRA:
Text of the CLRA
Class Actions:
Code Civ. Proc. §382
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23
"Fairness" Act
Recent Posts:
"Applying Proposition 64 to Pending Cases: The Con...
80 more bloggers weigh in on freedom of the press
New Prop. 64 trial court order: Bosch v. Kia Motors
"Blogs - Cutting Edge or Bleeding Edge?"
New unpublished UCL decision: Schulz v. Neovi Data...
New review petition: FATE v. Superior Court
New appellate brief
New pending appeal involving Prop. 64 retroactivit...
New blog page: Pending Supreme Court appeals invo...
Blogger amicus brief filed yesterday in Apple case
California Law Blogs:
Bag and Baggage
California Appellate Report
California Election Law
California Labor & Employment Law
California Wage Law
Class Action Spot
Criminal Appeal
Declarations and Exclusions
Alextronic Discovery
Employment Law Observer
Freespace
Gilbert Submits
Law Limits
Legal Commentary
The Legal Reader
May it Please the Court
Ninth Circuit Blog (criminal)
Public Defender Dude
Silicon Valley Media Law Blog
So Cal Law Blog
More Law Blogs:
Abstract Appeal
Appellate Law & Practice
Between Lawyers
Blawg Republic
Blawg Review
Blog 702
Closing Argument
The Common Scold
Connecticut Law Blog
Corp Law Blog
Delaware Law Office
Dennis Kennedy
eLawyer Blog
Election Law
Employee Relations Law and News
Employment Blawg
Ernie the Attorney
Groklaw
Have Opinion, Will Travel
How Appealing
InhouseBlog
Inter Alia
Internet Cases
IP Law Observer
LawMeme
LawSites
Legal Blog Watch
Legal Tags
Legal Underground
LibraryLaw Blog
My Shingle
netlawblog
the [non]billable hour
Out-of-the-Box Lawyering
Point of Law
Real Lawyers Have Blogs
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law & Policy
TechnoLawyer Blog
UnivAtty
The Volokh Conspiracy
The UCL Practitioner
Monday, April 18, 2005
Supreme Court development
On Thursday, the Supreme Court gave itself 30 additional days, until May 13, 2005, to grant or deny review in Mastercard Int’l, Inc. v. Superior Court (Cal. Supreme Court case no. S131416). As you may recall, that review petition challenges San Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard A. Kramer’s first order holding that Prop. 64 does NOT apply to pending cases. Under Rule of Court 28.2(b), no further extensions are allowed, so if the petition is not granted by May 13, it will be deemed denied. This appears to be the only Prop. 64 case in which the Supreme Court has taken any action lately.
- posted by Kim Kralowec @ 9:54 AM
Comments:
Kimberly,
Enjoyed your talk on Prop 64 at the NOCALL conference on Saturday. In case anyone needs research of this measure, our firm can provide research of Prop 64 (2004). Log on to www.legintent.com or call 1-800-666-1917 for more info.
Maria
Post a Comment
Enjoyed your talk on Prop 64 at the NOCALL conference on Saturday. In case anyone needs research of this measure, our firm can provide research of Prop 64 (2004). Log on to www.legintent.com or call 1-800-666-1917 for more info.
Maria
# posted by Anonymous : 12:55 PM