The UCL Practitioner

Monday, January 31, 2005

Two new pro-plaintiff Prop. 64 rulings
Two more judges, in San Diego and Sacramento Counties, have issued rulings that Proposition 64 does not apply to pending cases:

Carpenters Work Preservation Comm. v. A-Mazing Install., Sacramento County Superior Court case no. 04AS02857, Judge Loren E. McMaster (tentative ruling dated 01/27/05)
City Financial Mortgage Servs., Inc. v. Abdullah, San Diego County Superior Court case no. IC833894, Judge Charles R. Hayes (ruling of 01/28/05) (as reported by a blog reader)

I do not have a copy of a formal order in the City Financial case; if and when I obtain it, I will update this post. UPDATE: The City Financial tentative ruling is accessible at this link. Also, I've preserved the Carpenters tentative ruling here.
- posted by Kim Kralowec @ 10:12 AM

Comments:

The decision in City Financial Mortgage Servs v. Abdullah, Case # IC833894 can be found at this web address: http://www.sandiego.courts.ca.gov/superior/online/ViewRuling.Asp
TENTATIVE rulings by case number can be found by seraching the San Diego Superior Court website at:http://www.sandiego.courts.ca.gov/superior/online/scsdrulings.html

# posted by

Anonymous : 10:54 AM