The UCL Practitioner has moved!  Please visit the first and only weblog on California's Business & Professions Code section 17200 (otherwise known as the Unfair Competition Law or "UCL") at its new home, www.uclpractitioner.com.
Proposition 64: 
Text of Proposition 64 
 Trial Court Orders
 Appellate Opinions
 Pending Appeals
 Appellate Briefs 
The CLRA: 
Text of the CLRA
 
Class Actions: 
Code Civ. Proc. §382
 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23
 "Fairness" Act
 
	
Recent Posts:
Supreme Court grants review in another Prop. 64 re...
 In appellate advocacy, where do you draw the line?
 New CAFA decision: Pfizer, Inc. v. Lott
 Upcoming MCLE conference on the UCL
 "California Consumers Notch Win"
 "Calif. Trial Judge Rules Prop. 64 Is Not Retroact...
 New UCL/class certification decision: Alan v. Amer...
 New UCL decision: People's Choice Wireless, Inc. v...
 Boston University law journal seeks articles on le...
 BlogHer 2005
 
California Law Blogs:
Bag and Baggage 
California Appellate Report
 California Election Law
 California Labor & Employment Law
 California Wage Law
 Class Action Spot
 Criminal Appeal
 Declarations and Exclusions
 Alextronic Discovery
 Employment Law Observer
 Freespace
 Gilbert Submits
 Law Limits
 Legal Commentary
 The Legal Reader
May it Please the Court
 Ninth Circuit Blog (criminal)
 Public Defender Dude
 Silicon Valley Media Law Blog
 So Cal Law Blog 
 
More Law Blogs:
Abstract Appeal
 Appellate Law & Practice
 Between Lawyers
 Blawg Republic
 Blawg Review
 Blog 702
 Closing Argument
 The Common Scold
 Connecticut Law Blog
 Corp Law Blog
 Delaware Law Office
 Dennis Kennedy
 eLawyer Blog
 Election Law
 Employee Relations Law and News
 Employment Blawg
 Ernie the Attorney
 Groklaw
 Have Opinion, Will Travel
 How Appealing
 InhouseBlog
 Inter Alia
 Internet Cases
 IP Law Observer
 LawMeme
 LawSites
 Legal Blog Watch
 Legal Tags
 Legal Underground
 LibraryLaw Blog
 My Shingle
 netlawblog
 the [non]billable hour
 Out-of-the-Box Lawyering
 Point of Law
 Real Lawyers Have Blogs
 SCOTUSblog
 Sentencing Law & Policy
 TechnoLawyer Blog
 UnivAtty
 The Volokh Conspiracy
 
	The UCL Practitioner
	
   
   
        Friday, August 12, 2005
   
   
    "The Baby and the Bathwater"
California Wage Law has an interesting post about Prop. 64 this week. It says that the amendments to the UCL have not stopped so-called "shakedown" suits. Coincidentally, a reader emailed me a copy of the complaint in the new 17200 case that is mentioned in that post. I'll see if I can put it up over the weekend. UPDATE: The pdf file includes the complaint itself but also some handwritten notes, which I can't really post online. In any event, the complaint is well-described in the Wage Law post. I express no view on whether it's a "shakedown" suit or not, but I do agree that Prop. 64 was far broader than necessary to remedy the problems it was meant to fix. A simple amendment requiring court approval of all settlements in UCL cases would have done the trick.
- posted by Kim Kralowec @ 9:07 AM
 
 
      
   
			Comments:
			
			
			
			Post a Comment
		
	
	

