The UCL Practitioner has moved!  Please visit the first and only weblog on California's Business & Professions Code section 17200 (otherwise known as the Unfair Competition Law or "UCL") at its new home, www.uclpractitioner.com.
Proposition 64: 
Text of Proposition 64 
 Trial Court Orders
 Appellate Opinions
 Pending Appeals
 Appellate Briefs 
The CLRA: 
Text of the CLRA
 
Class Actions: 
Code Civ. Proc. §382
 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23
 "Fairness" Act
 
	
Recent Posts:
"1st District Rejects Retroactive Use of Initiativ...
 Press coverage of CDR v. Mervyn's
 Impact of CDR v. Mervyn's on Judge Sabraw's tentat...
 BREAKING NEWS: Court of Appeal holds that Prop. 64...
 Consumer Advocates opinion is now up
 Three more Prop. 64 rulings
 Court of Appeal issues unpublished opinion in Cons...
 Two new pro-plaintiff Prop. 64 rulings
 "Lawsuits Take Aim at Ads for Alcohol"
 First District to consider Prop. 64 retroactivity ...
 
California Law Blogs:
Bag and Baggage 
California Appellate Report
 California Election Law
 California Labor & Employment Law
 California Wage Law
 Class Action Spot
 Criminal Appeal
 Declarations and Exclusions
 Alextronic Discovery
 Employment Law Observer
 Freespace
 Gilbert Submits
 Law Limits
 Legal Commentary
 The Legal Reader
May it Please the Court
 Ninth Circuit Blog (criminal)
 Public Defender Dude
 Silicon Valley Media Law Blog
 So Cal Law Blog 
 
More Law Blogs:
Abstract Appeal
 Appellate Law & Practice
 Between Lawyers
 Blawg Republic
 Blawg Review
 Blog 702
 Closing Argument
 The Common Scold
 Connecticut Law Blog
 Corp Law Blog
 Delaware Law Office
 Dennis Kennedy
 eLawyer Blog
 Election Law
 Employee Relations Law and News
 Employment Blawg
 Ernie the Attorney
 Groklaw
 Have Opinion, Will Travel
 How Appealing
 InhouseBlog
 Inter Alia
 Internet Cases
 IP Law Observer
 LawMeme
 LawSites
 Legal Blog Watch
 Legal Tags
 Legal Underground
 LibraryLaw Blog
 My Shingle
 netlawblog
 the [non]billable hour
 Out-of-the-Box Lawyering
 Point of Law
 Real Lawyers Have Blogs
 SCOTUSblog
 Sentencing Law & Policy
 TechnoLawyer Blog
 UnivAtty
 The Volokh Conspiracy
 
	The UCL Practitioner
	
   
   
        Thursday, February 03, 2005
   
   
    Third District to hear oral argument on Prop. 64 in March
The First District fired the first shot, and the Fourth District is expected to enter the battle soon. Now, the Third District is readying its weapons. Oral argument has been scheduled for March 21, 2005 at 9:30 a.m. in Fair Business America, LLC v. Mattel, Inc., Third Appellate District, case no. C044134. The upcoming appellate oral argument schedule looks like this:
- Thursday, February 17, 2005, 1:30 p.m.:
- Lytwyn v. Fry's Electronics, Inc., Fourth Appellate District, Division One, case no. D042401 (Benke, Nares & Aaron, JJ.)
- Biven v. Corel, Inc., Fourth Appellate District, Division One, case no. D043407 (Haller, O'Rourke & Aaron, JJ.)
- Monday, March 21, 2005, 9:30 a.m.:
Once again, I urge those who are planning to attend these arguments to double-check the Court's calendar in case they are rescheduled. I'm still looking for a roving reporter to attend the arguments on February 17 and send me a report (which will be published here with or without credit, at your option). If you would like to be that reporter, drop me a line.
- Fair Business America, LLC v. Mattel, Inc., Third Appellate District, case no. C044134
- posted by Kim Kralowec @ 5:53 PM
 
 
      
   
			Comments:
			
			Post a Comment
		
	
	
