The UCL Practitioner has moved!  Please visit the first and only weblog on California's Business & Professions Code section 17200 (otherwise known as the Unfair Competition Law or "UCL") at its new home, www.uclpractitioner.com.
Proposition 64: 
Text of Proposition 64 
 Trial Court Orders
 Appellate Opinions
 Pending Appeals
 Appellate Briefs 
The CLRA: 
Text of the CLRA
 
Class Actions: 
Code Civ. Proc. §382
 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23
 "Fairness" Act
 
	
Recent Posts:
"Defense firms hail Prop. 64: Tougher standards fo...
 Another new Prop. 64 retroactivity order: Center f...
 Another Supreme Court petition for review raises P...
 New UCL decision: Wolski v. Fremont Inv. & Loan
 "Commentary: Prospective Application of Propositio...
 Prop. 64 raised in pending Cal. Supreme Court case...
 Thank you, fellow bloggers
 List of Proposition 64 orders
 Consumer Advocates briefs back online
 Another Supreme Court petition for review raises P...
 
California Law Blogs:
Bag and Baggage 
California Appellate Report
 California Election Law
 California Labor & Employment Law
 California Wage Law
 Class Action Spot
 Criminal Appeal
 Declarations and Exclusions
 Alextronic Discovery
 Employment Law Observer
 Freespace
 Gilbert Submits
 Law Limits
 Legal Commentary
 The Legal Reader
May it Please the Court
 Ninth Circuit Blog (criminal)
 Public Defender Dude
 Silicon Valley Media Law Blog
 So Cal Law Blog 
 
More Law Blogs:
Abstract Appeal
 Appellate Law & Practice
 Between Lawyers
 Blawg Republic
 Blawg Review
 Blog 702
 Closing Argument
 The Common Scold
 Connecticut Law Blog
 Corp Law Blog
 Delaware Law Office
 Dennis Kennedy
 eLawyer Blog
 Election Law
 Employee Relations Law and News
 Employment Blawg
 Ernie the Attorney
 Groklaw
 Have Opinion, Will Travel
 How Appealing
 InhouseBlog
 Inter Alia
 Internet Cases
 IP Law Observer
 LawMeme
 LawSites
 Legal Blog Watch
 Legal Tags
 Legal Underground
 LibraryLaw Blog
 My Shingle
 netlawblog
 the [non]billable hour
 Out-of-the-Box Lawyering
 Point of Law
 Real Lawyers Have Blogs
 SCOTUSblog
 Sentencing Law & Policy
 TechnoLawyer Blog
 UnivAtty
 The Volokh Conspiracy
 
	The UCL Practitioner
	
   
   
        Thursday, December 23, 2004
   
   
    Three more Prop. 64 tentative rulings
I've obtained copies of three more tentative rulings on the retroactivity question, all holding that Prop. 64 applies to pending cases. Please note that I have no information on whether these tentative rulings were contested, argued, or adopted in the form in which I received them:
If the Coe tentative was adopted, then two judges of the Orange County Superior Court have reached opposite conclusions about whether Prop. 64 is retroactive.
- Bivens v. Sanford, Los Angeles County Superior Court case no. SC075348 (South Central District, Compton), Judge Victoria M. Chavez (tentative ruling dated 12/03/04)
- Coe v. Anna’s Linen Co., Orange County Superior Court case no. 04CC00660, Judge Jonathan H. Cannon (tentative ruling dated 12/16/04)
- United Policyholders v. Willis Group Holdings, Ltd., San Diego County Superior Court case no. GIC833705, Judge John S. Meyer (tentative ruling dated 12/17/04)
- posted by Kim Kralowec @ 7:15 AM
 
 
      
   
			Comments:
			
			Post a Comment
		
	
	
