The UCL Practitioner
Friday, June 25, 2004
Blogosphere comment on the Janik decision
Declarations and Exclusions has this detailed post on Janik v. Rudy, Exelrod & Zieff.

The Legal Reader has this to say: "Section 17200 was bad enough when it was an occassional tool for clever plaintiffs' attorneys. Now, apparently, it is mandatory."

And So Cal Lawyer says, "Pardon me, I have to go now and file motions to amend all of my pending business litigation complaints to include 17200 claims."

(My original post on Janik is here.)
Comments: Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger

© 2003-2005 by Kimberly A. Kralowec